11/18 Reading Response

         After watching the Netflix documentary I Am Not Your Negro (2017) directed by Raol Peck, the concept of hope was one theme, among others, that stood out to me (once again). Through this lens of hope, I found myself connecting this source to the video lecture by Dr. Tricia Rose, “How Structural Racism Works”. For me, this connection is most salient in both the beginning and ending of the documentary. To start, the documentary begins with a clip from 1968 from the Dick Cavett Show. During this clip, the host asks James Baldwin a series of questions, such as “why aren’t [black people] optimistic?” and “is it at once getting much better and still hopeless [for black people]?” The second question, paired with Baldwin’s initial response (i.e. “I don’t think there is much hope for it”, the “it” I believe referring to black people’s sense of optimism), mirrors Dr. Rose’s response at the end of her lecture when answering a question that asks about “the next opportunity [for progress]?”. Similar to Baldwin’s response, Dr. Rose’s reply suggests that maintaining a sense of optimism, a sense of hope, is near impossible for folx due to the widespread scale of systemic inequity across multiple areas of life. 

        I believe this connection between I Am Not Your Negro and Dr. Rose’s lecture is furthered when the documentary ends with a separate clip of Baldwin explaining why he is “forced to be an optimist” (1:27:54). In my opinion, Baldwin’s explanation here reframes what we have already learned from Dr. Rose’s lecture: that the livelihood of black Americans is heavily influenced by inequitable structures that benefit those from a white demographic and pigeonhole those from a non-white demographic. Thus when Baldwin says, “the future of the Negro in this country is precisely as bright or as dark as the future of the country” (1:28:18), he is saying that the well-being of a black American is wholly dependent on America’s continuation or disruption of inequitable systems that criminalize black people. According to Dr. Rose, “we have a lot of power to change the public stories we tell” and by questioning and unlearning widely held beliefs that are acted out on an institutional level we can begin to change our country’s narrative, and by association, treatment of people of color. 

        Furthermore, I see a connection between Baldwin’s final reflection and the Netflix documentary13th and “Examined Life - Judith Butler & Sunaura Taylor” (2010). Specifically, when Baldwin implores his audience, namely white Americans from both North and South regions of the country, to ask themselves “why it was necessary to have a ‘Nigger’ in the first place” I believe Baldwin is saying two very important things (1:28:45). First, I believe acknowledging that white America needed to invent a system that portrayed people of color as those of value only for labor makes clear what we learned from 13th--that the American economy has been, and continues to be, dependent upon free labor of those that our system chooses to criminalize. Second, I believe the posing of this question reveals an insidious reality that complicates the concept that Judith Butler and Sunaura Taylor put forth: that we live in an interdependent society where we require help from one another in order to be successful. To use Baldwin’s words, America“invented” a system of slavery because we needed “help” to create a whole new world, however rather than rely on one another to provide assistance freely when it was needed most, America instead developed a system of slavery to ensure our country’s needs were always met by those we deemed as chattel. To be sure, the invented structure that Baldwin describes is likely not what Butler and Taylor envisioned when reflecting on body politics, nevertheless when putting the two sources in concert with one another, the idea of “help” and being “interconnected” is complicated because it proves that America is indeed a country where people rely on others, but historically has chosen to use systems of power to oppress others into livelihoods of indentured servitude, rather than create systems that are fair and responsive to the needs of others by seeing one another’s humanity first (as Butler and Taylor suggest we should do).

        To end, I share a final resource that furthers Baldwin’s final thoughts about America’s “needs”: The 1619 Project published by The New York Times. Similar to I Am Not Your Negro and 13th, The 1619 project is a source that aims to unveil the history behind America’s development as the country we know today and how that development is intimately tied to our nation’s need for/reliance on slavery. For those who enjoy podcasts, I recommend “Episode 1: The Fight for a True Democracy” of 1619 as a place to begin.





Comments

  1. I appreciate how you have so articulately interwoven so many of the meaningful ideas from our class readings and videos to convey your message, your piece has really got me thinking about the stories we tell and how they shape our world, challenge and push back against the inequities and injustice. I wonder how this looks as a teacher of this nation's youth and how we can use stories, love and critical hope to shift young people's mindset to a place of optimism.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Ms. McKay Math,
      Thank you for your comment and praise! Regarding your question (i.e. I wonder how this looks as a teacher of this nation's youth and how we can use stories, love and critical hope to shift young people's mindset to a place of optimism): I think this will look and sound different depending on the demographics of a classroom and the identity/ies of the teacher(s)/ staff member(s) responsible for teaching those students. There is SO much inequity in the world... you figure for every "ism" that exists there is an inequity that connects to it and is further complicated when connected to another "ism" (here I am calling on Kimbrele Crenshaw's noteworthy concept of intersectionality). So I think the stories we choose to tell (be it re-telling or re-framing or perhaps even introducing for the first time!) depends largely upon who is in front of who--only then can we provide a context that is culturally relevant and meaningful to those we teach. That said, I think being able to do any of this, first requires teachers/school staff to do a lot of individual work with understanding their own identities/biases/privileges so that they know how to address theses topics with fellow staff members and students alike.

      Delete
  2. Hi Alyssa. Thank you for your post. I liked how you correlated Baldwin's lack of hope with Dr. Rose's "The next step for progressing" as both themes make me wonder: Is there a hope for a future for Black and Brown people in the U.S.? We have been learning how systemic racism is real and how it is greatly affecting the lives of Black people. So, I received Baldwin's message a little differently. I did not hear the optimism in his voice but rather the despair when he proposed that one poignant question to White society at the end of the documentary: "What White people have to do is to try to find out in their own hearts why it was necessary to have a nigger in the first place?" As he stated, until this question is faced, there can be no change. And to be honest, I don't see this question ever getting answered; therefore, I see no hope for the future but do you really think interdependence can ever happen?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. MadameDuffaut,

      Thank you for your comment. I do think America is already interdependent. And I think Baldwin saw this too, but in an understandably negative perspective. I think the term "interdependent" typically garners a positive connotation when not placed in this context. However, what I heard in Baldwin's final reflection was an acknowledgment that America needs and has relied upon slavery in order to be successful. This of course pushes against the idea of interdependence being a positive sentiment, and instead posits interdependence in America as parasitic relationship between those of white and non-white origin. So in this sense, I do think interdependence has happened and continues to happen in America, albeit on unfair terms. I think we see unfair interdependence often in our economy wherein "the rich get richer and the poor get poorer" because we continue to follow systems and narratives that perpetuate historical hierarchies that put those of low socioeconomic status and/or those who identify as BIPOC at a disadvantage.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

9/16 Reading Response

Manifesto

9/30 Reading Response